5 Star AI & Data Governance

LEGACY PUBLISHING

Understanding the Accuracy Dimension of Data Quality

Written by Chef Joe DiFalco in

In our last deep dive, we explored Currency—the freshness factor of data quality. Today, we’re tackling another critical dimension that sits at the very heart of trustworthy data: Accuracy. And here’s what keeps me up at night: organizations everywhere are making million-dollar decisions based on data they assume is accurate, without ever actually verifying it.

What is Accuracy in Data Governance?

Accuracy is the degree to which data correctly reflects reality—the real-world entities, events, or situations it’s supposed to represent. According to DAMA International, accuracy measures “how well the available data corresponds with experiences in the real world.”

But let me give you a simpler way to think about it: Accuracy answers the question: “Does this data tell the truth about what actually exists or what actually happened?”

Not what someone thought happened. Not what the system defaulted to when it couldn’t figure something out. Not a “close enough” approximation that nobody bothered to fix. The actual, verifiable truth.

The GPS Analogy

Picture this: Your GPS tells you to turn right on Maple Street to reach your destination. You turn right… and drive straight into a lake. Turns out, Maple Street was there—ten years ago. Before the city redirected it during infrastructure improvements. The data was valid (proper street format), complete (included the street name), and even current (recently refreshed)—but it was inaccurate. It didn’t match reality.

You’re soaking wet, your car is ruined, and you’re extremely confident that data quality matters now.

That’s an accuracy problem. And if you think that’s painful in navigation, imagine it happening with patient medication dosages, financial risk calculations, or supply chain logistics across a multi-billion dollar operation.

Why Accuracy Matters for AI, Compliance, and Risk Management

In the context of a 5 Star AI & Data Governance framework, accuracy isn’t negotiable. It’s foundational. Here’s why:

1. AI Doesn’t Know When You’re Lying to It

Feed an AI model inaccurate training data and it will confidently make terrible predictions—at scale, at speed, and with impressive-looking confidence scores.

Your fraud detection model trained on incorrectly classified transactions? It’s learning the wrong patterns. Your recommendation engine using product data with switched specifications? It’s suggesting items customers definitely don’t want. Your predictive maintenance system relying on sensor data with calibration errors? Equipment failures nobody saw coming.

Here’s the scary part: AI systems can’t tell you when their training data is inaccurate. They just assume you gave them good information and build their entire worldview on top of it. Garbage in, gospel out—except the gospel is wrong, and nobody realizes it until something breaks.

According to research, poor quality data undermines AI initiatives across all business functions, with organizations experiencing 60% higher project failure rates when accuracy issues persist.

2. The $12.9 Million Question

Let’s talk money. Because executives love talking money, and data accuracy has a direct line to the bottom line.

Gartner research consistently shows that poor data quality—with accuracy problems at the core—costs organizations an average of $12.9 million annually. And that’s just the average. Some organizations are bleeding significantly more.

Consider these real-world impacts:

  • JP Morgan’s “London Whale” incident: A $6 billion trading loss traced back to errors in risk management models fed by inaccurate data
  • Tesco’s accounting scandal: A £326 million profit overstatement caused by inaccurate supplier payment data
  • Uber’s driver underpayment: At least $45 million paid back to “tens of thousands” of drivers due to calculations based on the wrong numbers

These aren’t data entry typos. These are accuracy failures that made headlines and destroyed shareholder value.

3. Accuracy Problems Compound Themselves

Here’s what makes accuracy particularly insidious: small inaccuracies multiply through your systems like compound interest—except in reverse.

One inaccurate customer address in your CRM? That’s annoying. But when that address feeds into your shipping system, your marketing automation platform, your customer service tools, your analytics dashboards, and your financial forecasting models? Now you’re shipping to the wrong location, sending emails that bounce, confusing customer service reps, skewing your geographic analysis, and misallocating marketing budgets.

Researchers studying accuracy issues found that error rates in enterprise data systems range from 0.5% to 30% at the field level. Even marginal inaccuracies of 1-5% can cause direct effects in terms of lost sales and operational disruptions.

One bad data point becomes a systemic problem faster than you can say “data quality initiative.”

4. Healthcare: Where Accuracy Isn’t Optional—It’s Life or Death

In healthcare, data accuracy directly impacts patient safety. Period.

Consider these scenarios that play out daily:

  • Wrong medication dosages in patient records leading to dangerous prescriptions
  • Inaccurate allergy information resulting in severe allergic reactions
  • Incorrect diagnostic codes affecting treatment plans
  • Mismatched patient identifiers causing procedures performed on the wrong patient

A 2024 study on healthcare data quality found that data defects frequently remained obscure until they led to negative outcomes—including medical errors that could have been prevented with accurate information.

The UK’s COVID-19 contact tracing failure is a stark example: approximately 16,000 positive tests were omitted from official numbers due to a data error, meaning an estimated 50,000 potentially infectious people weren’t contacted for isolation. One accuracy failure. Massive public health consequences.

Accuracy vs. Completeness, Validity, and Currency

People constantly confuse accuracy with other data quality dimensions. Let’s clear that up:

Accuracy vs. Completeness

  • Completeness: Do you have all the required data fields populated?
  • Accuracy: Is the data that’s in those fields actually correct?

Example: Your customer record has a phone number (complete!). But it’s the wrong phone number—maybe it’s from their previous employer, or it has a typo, or it belongs to someone else entirely (inaccurate!).

Accuracy vs. Validity

  • Validity: Does the data conform to defined formats and business rules?
  • Accuracy: Does it reflect reality, regardless of format?

Example: The email “john.smith@company.com” is perfectly valid—it follows email format rules. But if John Smith’s actual email is “j.smith@company.com,” then your valid data is inaccurate.

Accuracy vs. Currency

  • Currency: Is this the most recent version of the truth?
  • Accuracy: Is it the truth at all?

Example: Your asset management system was updated yesterday (very current!). But it says the server is in Building A when it’s actually been in Building B for the past six months—someone just never corrected the initial error (inaccurate from day one).

The Key Distinction: You can have current, complete, valid data that’s completely inaccurate. All dimensions matter, but accuracy is about fundamental correctness—does your data reflect what’s actually true in the real world?

Root Causes of Accuracy Failures in Enterprise Systems

Understanding why accuracy problems happen is the first step to preventing them. Here are the usual suspects:

1. Human Error During Data Entry

Despite automation, humans still create a shocking amount of data—and humans make mistakes. Typos, transposed numbers, misread handwriting, copy-paste errors, selecting the wrong dropdown option… the list goes on.

Studies show that data scientists spend 50% to 80% of their time on data wrangling and preparation—much of it correcting accuracy issues that originated at data entry.

2. System Integration and Migration Issues

When data moves between systems—during migrations, integrations, or regular synchronization—accuracy can suffer from:

  • Conversion errors between different data formats
  • Truncated fields when target systems have different field lengths
  • Mismatched data types causing values to be rounded or lost
  • Failed validation during transfer

One survey found that data integration issues are among the primary causes of poor data quality, with conversion errors happening regularly when databases don’t properly integrate.

3. Lack of Validation at Point of Entry

Many systems accept whatever data gets thrown at them—no questions asked. Without real-time validation checks, structurally invalid or obviously incorrect data flows into your systems unchallenged.

Example: A healthcare system accepting “January 32” as a birthdate, or a financial system allowing a negative value for age. These should be caught immediately, but often aren’t.

4. Outdated Reference Data

Remember that GPS example? Sometimes data was accurate when entered, but the real world changed and nobody updated the reference information your systems rely on.

Reference data—like postal codes, product categories, country codes, or organizational hierarchies—must be regularly validated against authoritative sources. When it’s not, accuracy suffers even though nothing technically “broke.”

5. Unclear Accountability

When nobody owns data accuracy, nobody maintains it. I’ve seen organizations where three different departments each think someone else is responsible for keeping customer data accurate.

Spoiler alert: None of them are doing it.

As Nicola Askham, Director of DAMA UK and The Data Governance Coach, frequently emphasizes: “Data governance and data quality rely very much on each other… their relationship is based on mutual interdependence.” Without clear data ownership and stewardship roles, accuracy initiatives become tactical band-aids rather than sustainable solutions.

The Real Cost of Inaccurate Data ($12.9M Gartner Statistic)

Yes, there are direct costs—wrong shipments, failed transactions, regulatory fines, wasted marketing spend. But the hidden costs? Those might be even bigger.

Eroded Trust in Data

Once people discover that “the system” has inaccurate data, they stop trusting any data from that system. Even when it’s correct.

I’ve watched organizations spend millions implementing beautiful analytics platforms that nobody uses because “we know the data’s wrong.” The platform works perfectly. The data just isn’t trusted anymore.

Death by a Thousand Verifications

When data accuracy is questionable, people start verifying everything manually. Customer service reps ask customers to confirm information that’s “in the system.” Analysts cross-check reports against multiple sources. Finance teams reconcile the same numbers three different ways.

That’s not efficiency. That’s an accuracy tax paid in human hours every single day.

Damaged Reputation and Customer Relationships

Call customers by the wrong name. Ship orders to old addresses. Send communications referencing products they returned. Charge incorrect amounts.

Do this enough times, and customers leave. Not just because of the inconvenience—but because inaccurate data signals that you don’t actually know or care about them.

In B2B contexts, research shows that inaccurate data causes sales teams to target the wrong decision-makers almost 86% of the time, directly impacting win rates and lengthening sales cycles.

Missed Strategic Opportunities

Bad decisions based on inaccurate data are obvious problems. But what about the good decisions you never make because you don’t trust your data enough to act?

That’s opportunity cost—and it’s almost impossible to measure because you never see what you missed.

So How Do You Actually Manage Accuracy?

Improving accuracy isn’t a one-time project. It’s an ongoing discipline. Here’s what actually works:

1. Establish Validation at the Point of Capture

Catch errors where they happen—at data entry. Implement:

  • Format checks: Ensuring data follows required patterns (phone numbers, email formats, postal codes)
  • Range validation: Values fall within acceptable parameters (age between 0-120, temperatures within realistic ranges)
  • Cross-field validation: Related fields are logically consistent (shipping dates after order dates, end dates after start dates)
  • Reference data checks: Entered values match authoritative sources (valid postal codes, recognized country codes)

The closer you catch accuracy problems to their source, the cheaper they are to fix.

2. Implement Regular Verification Against Trusted Sources

Don’t just trust data because it’s “in the system.” Regularly verify it against authoritative external sources:

  • Address validation services
  • National/international standards databases (postal codes, country codes, industry classifications)
  • Third-party data providers for customer contact information
  • Government registries for business entities
  • Industry-specific reference databases

Schedule these checks based on how quickly the underlying reality changes. Customer contact information? Verify frequently. Product specifications? Less often.

3. Create Clear Data Ownership and Stewardship

Someone needs to be responsible for accuracy—with the authority and resources to maintain it.

Data Owners: Business leaders accountable for the accuracy of specific data domains Data Stewards: Subject matter experts who understand what “accurate” means for their domain and have the knowledge to verify it Data Quality Team: Technical resources who implement quality checks, monitor metrics, and facilitate remediation

Without clear ownership, accuracy problems become everyone’s problem—which means they’re nobody’s problem.

4. Enable User-Driven Corrections (With Governance)

The people who use data daily often spot inaccuracies first. Create mechanisms for them to:

  • Flag suspected errors easily
  • Submit corrections through defined workflows
  • See the status of their submissions

But—and this is critical—implement governance controls. Not every user-submitted change should go straight into production. Balance agility with appropriate review processes based on data criticality.

5. Monitor and Measure Accuracy Proactively

You can’t improve what you don’t measure. Establish metrics like:

  • Error rates: Percentage of records with accuracy issues per domain
  • Accuracy scores: Proportion of data matching authoritative sources
  • Correction cycle time: How long it takes to fix identified inaccuracies
  • Accuracy by source: Which systems or processes produce the most accurate data

Set target thresholds and alert when accuracy falls below acceptable levels. Don’t wait for accuracy problems to cause business impacts—catch them early.

6. Build Accuracy Rules into AI and Analytics Systems

When building AI models or analytics solutions, incorporate accuracy checks:

  • Establish confidence thresholds for predictions
  • Implement anomaly detection to flag suspicious patterns
  • Require data accuracy attestations before training models
  • Build feedback loops where model performance issues trigger data quality reviews

Remember: AI magnifies whatever’s in your training data. Inaccurate inputs create systematically inaccurate outputs—at scale.

The 5 Star Restaurant Parallel (Because Every Good Framework Needs a Metaphor)

Think of accuracy like ingredient authenticity in your 5-star kitchen:

High Accuracy: Your menu says “Maine lobster” and you’re serving actual Maine lobster—not imitation seafood, not lobster from somewhere else, not even last week’s lobster. Every ingredient is exactly what it claims to be. When your sommelier recommends a 2015 Bordeaux, it is a 2015 Bordeaux from that specific château. When a dish is labeled gluten-free, it’s genuinely gluten-free. Guests can trust everything about what they’re served because you verify authenticity obsessively.

Low Accuracy: Your menu is full of promises your kitchen can’t keep. The “wild-caught salmon” is farmed. The “grass-fed beef” is conventional. The “fresh herbs” came dried from a warehouse three months ago. Servers tell guests one thing, but the kitchen delivers something different. Nothing is quite what it claims to be—and once guests realize this, your reputation is destroyed. No amount of beautiful plating can fix fundamental dishonesty about what’s on the plate.

The head chef (your data governance program) needs to:

  • Verify supplier authenticity—accuracy checks against trusted sources before ingredients enter the kitchen
  • Conduct regular quality audits—ongoing verification that ingredients remain what they claim to be
  • Train staff on identification—ensuring everyone can recognize when something’s not right
  • Create correction workflows—clear processes for handling misidentified or mislabeled ingredients
  • Track authenticity metrics—knowing which suppliers consistently deliver what they promise

A 5-star restaurant built on inauthentic ingredients won’t stay 5-star for long. Neither will a data-driven organization built on inaccurate data.

Governance Frameworks That Improve Accuracy

When you’re establishing accuracy standards in your governance framework, here’s what matters:

1. Define Accuracy Requirements by Data Domain and Use Case

Not all data needs the same level of accuracy, and treating it all the same wastes resources.

Patient medication records in healthcare? They need to be exactly correct—lives depend on it. Historical promotional campaign data for trend analysis? “Close enough” might be perfectly adequate.

Define accuracy requirements based on:

  • Criticality: What happens if this data is wrong?
  • Regulatory requirements: What does compliance demand?
  • Business impact: How sensitive are decisions to accuracy issues?
  • Verification cost: What’s feasible to validate given resources?

2. Establish “Source of Truth” for Each Data Element

For every data element, clearly identify which system or source is authoritative. When Customer Name appears in your CRM, ERP, warehouse system, and customer portal—which one is correct when they disagree?

Without defined sources of truth, accuracy becomes a matter of opinion rather than governance.

3. Implement Tiered Validation Based on Risk

Not every data element needs the same validation rigor:

  • High-risk data (financial transactions, patient identifiers, regulatory reporting): Multi-level validation with automated checks plus human verification
  • Medium-risk data (customer contact information, inventory levels): Automated validation plus periodic sampling
  • Low-risk data (marketing preferences, usage analytics): Basic format checks

Match your validation investment to actual business risk.

4. Create Accuracy Feedback Loops

Build mechanisms to learn from accuracy problems:

  • When errors are discovered, trace them to their source
  • Identify patterns in where and why accuracy issues occur
  • Implement preventive measures at root cause levels
  • Share lessons learned across data domains

Each accuracy failure is a learning opportunity—don’t waste it.

5. Balance Accuracy with Other Dimensions

Sometimes other dimensions matter more than perfect accuracy:

  • Real-time trading data needs to be fast (timeliness) even if individual values have minor inaccuracies
  • Customer sentiment analysis needs to be complete (completeness) even if individual classifications aren’t perfectly accurate
  • Historical trend data needs to be consistent (consistency) even if absolute accuracy has degraded over time

Understand the trade-offs and make informed decisions about where accuracy must be uncompromising versus where it can be balanced against other needs.

Get the full framework in 5 Star AI & Data Governance

Real-World Success: Organizations Getting Accuracy Right

Healthcare: Kaiser Permanente’s Data Quality Initiative

Kaiser Permanente implemented comprehensive data accuracy programs across their electronic health records system, including:

  • Real-time validation at point of entry for critical fields like medication dosages and patient identifiers
  • Regular reconciliation between pharmacy systems and clinical records
  • Designated data stewards responsible for accuracy within specific clinical domains
  • Automated checks flagging potentially dangerous data combinations

Results included measurable improvements in patient safety indicators and reduced medical errors attributed to data inaccuracies.

Financial Services: Building Accuracy into Risk Models

Following high-profile losses from inaccurate risk data, major financial institutions have implemented:

  • Multiple independent validation sources for market data
  • Automated reconciliation between trading systems and risk calculation engines
  • Data quality scorecards presented to risk committees
  • “Accuracy attestation” requirements before models are moved to production

These measures haven’t eliminated accuracy issues—but they’ve created systematic approaches to identifying and correcting them before they cause catastrophic losses.

Retail: Continuous Data Verification

Leading e-commerce platforms maintain accuracy through:

  • Automated product data validation against manufacturer specifications
  • Customer feedback loops where shoppers can report inaccurate product information
  • Regular reconciliation of inventory data between warehouses and online systems
  • Machine learning models that flag suspicious changes in product data

The result? Fewer customer complaints, reduced returns due to incorrect product information, and higher customer trust.

Conclusion: Accuracy as the Foundation of Trust

Accuracy doesn’t have the sexy appeal of “AI-powered” or “real-time” or “blockchain-enabled.” But it’s absolutely fundamental.

You can have the fastest data pipelines in the world, the most sophisticated AI models money can buy, and dashboards that would make a designer weep with joy—but if your data is inaccurate, you’re just making bad decisions really quickly with beautiful visualizations.

Get accuracy right, and you build a foundation of trust that everything else can stand on. Your teams trust the data enough to act on it. Your executives trust reports enough to make strategic decisions. Your customers trust you enough to keep doing business with you.

And that’s the difference between a data governance program that’s checking boxes and one that’s actually driving business value.

Because in the end, data that doesn’t accurately reflect reality isn’t data—it’s expensive fiction.

Key References & Resources

Core Frameworks:

  • DAMA International DMBOK 2.0 (2024 Revision) – Added currency as a recognized data quality dimension and refined accuracy definitions with examples
  • Gartner Data Quality Research – Consistently reporting $12.9M average annual cost of poor data quality to organizations
  • ISO 25012 – International standard defining data quality characteristics including accuracy

Research & Studies:

  • McKinsey Global Institute – Research showing poor quality data leads to 20% decrease in productivity and 30% increase in costs
  • Forrester Research – Finding that nearly one-third of analysts spend over 40% of their time validating data before strategic use
  • Precisely’s 2025 Data Integrity Trends Report – Identifying quality issues as dominant technical barrier to transformation success

Leading Thought Leaders & Organizations:

  • Nicola Askham – The Data Governance Coach, Director of DAMA UK, emphasizing the symbiotic relationship between data governance and data quality
  • DAMA UK Working Group – “The Six Primary Dimensions for Data Quality Assessment” (2013), establishing widely-adopted accuracy definitions
  • Thomas Redman – Research on accuracy error rates in enterprise systems (0.5-30% at field level)
  • Jim Harris – Obsessive Compulsive Data Quality, 20+ years documenting data quality challenges and solutions
  • Malcolm Hawker – Former Gartner Analyst, current CDO at Profisee, authority on data quality in MDM implementations

Industry Standards & Best Practices:

  • HIPAA (Healthcare) – Requiring accuracy standards for patient data
  • BCBS 239 (Banking) – Principles for effective risk data aggregation emphasizing accuracy
  • GDPR (European Union) – Mandating accuracy as fundamental principle of data processing

References & Case Studies:

Note: While these sources provided foundation for the article’s content, specific statistics and examples were drawn from multiple research papers and industry reports to ensure accuracy of the accuracy discussion—because that would be ironic otherwise.

More posts

Secret Link